CLAUDE.md: Behavioral Guidelines 섹션 추가
LLM 공통 코딩 실수 감축 가이드 4섹션 (Think Before Coding / Simplicity First / Surgical Changes / Goal-Driven Execution) 원문 영문 보존. 기존 한국어 "Claude 행동 원칙"과 보완 관계. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -575,3 +575,70 @@ docker exec trading-postgres psql -U kyu -d trading_ai -c "
|
|||||||
- [x] n8n DB 마이그레이션 오류 수정 완료 (51개 마이그레이션 등록)
|
- [x] n8n DB 마이그레이션 오류 수정 완료 (51개 마이그레이션 등록)
|
||||||
- [x] SSL 인증서 자동 갱신 설정 완료 (certbot.timer + deploy hook → nginx reload)
|
- [x] SSL 인증서 자동 갱신 설정 완료 (certbot.timer + deploy hook → nginx reload)
|
||||||
도메인: al/cla/n8/pns/tr.kyleyang.co.kr, 훅: /etc/letsencrypt/renewal-hooks/deploy/reload-nginx.sh
|
도메인: al/cla/n8/pns/tr.kyleyang.co.kr, 훅: /etc/letsencrypt/renewal-hooks/deploy/reload-nginx.sh
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Behavioral Guidelines (LLM 공통 실수 감축)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 1. Think Before Coding
|
||||||
|
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Before implementing:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
|
||||||
|
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
|
||||||
|
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
|
||||||
|
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 2. Simplicity First
|
||||||
|
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- No features beyond what was asked.
|
||||||
|
- No abstractions for single-use code.
|
||||||
|
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
|
||||||
|
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
|
||||||
|
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 3. Surgical Changes
|
||||||
|
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When editing existing code:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
|
||||||
|
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
|
||||||
|
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
|
||||||
|
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When your changes create orphans:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
|
||||||
|
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 4. Goal-Driven Execution
|
||||||
|
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
|
||||||
|
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
|
||||||
|
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||||
|
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||||
|
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user